Which action would you take to fix a deployment package after transfer?

• A. Edit at the destination site only
• B. Create a new package at the destination and install it
• C. Edit at the source site and redeploy the whole package to the destination site.
• D. Edit at the source site and save as a new separate package

Answer: (C)

Editing at the source and redeploying the entire package is best because deployment packages are treated as a single, versioned artifact that should be controlled from a single source of truth. When you make changes at the source, you preserve the package’s integrity and dependencies, and redeploying the full package to the destination ensures the destination receives an identical, complete version. This approach keeps environments in sync, maintains clear change history, and makes rollbacks predictable.

Editing only at the destination would leave the original source unchanged, creating drift between environments. Creating a new package at the destination would produce a separate artifact that doesn’t reflect the source package’s structure or history, complicating maintenance. Saving as a new separate package (instead of updating the existing one) similarly results in multiple divergent packages rather than a single, coherent update.