Which practice best supports CLM admin audits and ongoing compliance?

• A. Maintaining up-to-date documentation of configurations, roles, access reviews, change history, and running compliance reports
• B. Relying on memory of admins for configurations
• C. Avoiding any access reviews to speed up onboarding
• D. Audit only at end of year without documentation

Answer: (A)

Keeping thorough, current documentation and ongoing visibility into configurations and access is essential for CLM admin audits and ongoing compliance. When configurations, roles, access reviews, and change history are up to date, you have a clear, defensible trail of who did what and when, which is critical for audits. Running compliance reports translates policy requirements into concrete, reviewable evidence, helping identify gaps, enforce governance, and show that controls remain effective as the system evolves. This approach supports accountability, reproducibility, and continuous assurance.

Relying on admins’ memory creates hidden gaps; undocumented changes can’t be verified later and increase audit risk. Skipping access reviews undermines a core control for ensuring the right people have the right access. Auditing only at year-end without documentation misses ongoing activity and changes, leaving an incomplete trail that’s harder to defend.